Saturday, November 12, 2016

Death: "To those left behind"

"We say that the hour of death cannot be forecast, but when we say this we imagine that hour as placed in an obscure and distant future.  It never occurs to us that it has any connection with the day already begun or that death could arrive this same afternoon, this afternoon which is so certain and which has every hour filled in advance." — Marcel Proust (French Novelist and Author, 1871-1922)

The Scout motto is "be prepared," but it's hard to be prepared for death, be it our own or a loved one's.  Halloween, 2014 marked the one-year anniversary of the day my father (Ronald Cromes, Sr.) died of Stage 4 Metastasized Lung Cancer.  And even after 365 days — that being 8,766 hours; 525,,949 minutes; 31,556,926 seconds —  I was STILL not "prepared for it."  I've talked with people who have lost one or both parents after facing this world without them for 30 or 40 years, and pretty much all of them have told me the same thing.  They would say: "You never stop missing them.  And you never REALLY 'get over' their death.  It just becomes more and more 'acceptable' as time goes on."  And there are most days that I am okay.  But there's also those brief painful moments when it feels like not ONE of those 31 million 556 thousand 926 seconds have even passed.  It feels just as fresh as the day it happened.  So, I guess it's true.  I may never really "get over" my father's death, but through time, it has gotten and will become more and more "acceptable."

Too much is unknown about what dying feels like or what (if anything) happens after you die to ever feel truly ready.  After over forty years of life, I can't say that I've ever been amongst the sick and the dying.  However, I have been amongst "the dead."  The older you get, the more often you become "those who are left behind;" those who are in the realm the living and yet having to bear the pain of losing a friend or a loved to death.  At first, it's like a nightmare that you can't seem to wake up from.  It's like your heart knows it's true, but your mind needs more convincing.  But then, it happens.  You attend their Wake.  You walk up to the coffin, and there they are.  But honestly, the hardest part is when you muster up the courage to touch them; to touch their cold hands that feel like they're chiseled out of stone.  That touch is electric.  That's when your mind is convinced.  That's when know it's for real.  That corpse that is lying in that coffin; that empty shell of lifeless material is no longer your friend or loved one.  It is a thing; an object; an object as inanimate as anything you have lying around your house.  It doesn't even know that you're standing over it.  And it doesn't care.  At this point, how one would act and react is unique to the individual.  After all, each and every one of us are truly unique.  That is how God made us.  Still, whether the death is slow due to terminal illness or senescence (i.e. old age) or whether it comes suddenly while a person is young (e.g. in a car accident), we ask ourselves: Why?  I mean, we know how, when, and where they died, and (if applicable) what they died of.  And yet, during such a difficult time, the "why question" remains within us all.  Why?  Why did this person die?  If you want to get deeper, you can ask: "Why do we die?"  It's about as simple a question as "Why do we live?"  If we were to look at it at a Secular level, we can look at life and death at a cellular level.  Yes, our cells divide and produce more cells to replace the ones that die.  But this is all directed by the information stored in our DNA.

Let's imagine for a moment that as the DNA gets copied over and over from the original template present in the egg+sperm zygote-embryo, some mistakes might occur and the integrity of the genetic material will generally degrade.  This is generally the basis of why our bodies start to fail on a cellular level (e.g. cancer).  Even though we produce "new" cells, the DNA has already been copied over and over and subjected to external sources of damage (e.g. UV radiation or harmful chemicals in the environment).  Kind of like if you were to make copies of an original document on a traditional scanner, and repeating that process over and over again.  In mammals and other Eukaryotes, DNA is arranged into structures called: Chromosomes, capped by a compound structural component called: Telomeres, which protect the end of the Chromosomes from deterioration or from fusion with neighboring Chromosomes.  They are kind of like the plastic tips at the end of our shoelaces that keep them from coming undone and maintain its structural integrity.  The more times a cell has replicated, the shorter these Telomeres become.  Why?  Because the cell can't replicate the DNA to the very end of the strand.  Once the Telomeres reach a certain "shortness," it signals the cell to die, thereby effectively limiting the number of times a cell can divide.  It is generally believed that this also has some effect on lifespans.  Also, some cells do NOT replicate (e.g. heart muscle or most neurons).  During a heart attack, more and more heart muscle begins to die off.  And once heart muscle dies, it can't be restored.  So, even if you do survive a heart attack, after a significant level of heart muscle has died, your heart is weaker and less tolerant to strenuous activity as a result, thereby making you more prone to additional heart attacks.  It is the same with neurons in the brain.  Once you maintain damage to your brain, it can't be easily repaired, especially considering the complexity of neural networks that you have formed over a lifetime.  And since your brain controls many other bodily functions, once you lose that, you're out of luck.  You can think about this on the level of the cell, the level of the organ, or the level of the body as a functioning whole.  But no matter how you look at it, it all comes down to the same theme of an eventual reduction in the integrity of the system that can no longer be repaired.  But is that ALL there is to it?  Are there OTHER REASONS why we die that is beyond the physical realm?  Death is a vast mystery, but there are things we can definitely say about it.  First, it is inevitable.  Second, it is irreversible.  And third, ts timing is unknown.  So, we know THAT we're going to die, and that once we do die, we're not coming back.  And yet, we never know WHEN we're going to die.  In the first edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, death was briefly defined as "the separation of the soul and the body,"  Each dictionary summarizes the definition as "the action of dying or being killed; the end of the life of a person or organism."  But notice that even though the phenomenon of death was defined, it did not have a reasoning behind it.  Once Science came into play, death not only had a definition, but also had a description and a criteria.

Death is now defined as a permanent and irreversible cessation of all biological functions that sustain a living organism.  The Medical Definition is: the permanent cessation of life and of all vital bodily functions (e.g. cerebral function, respiration, pulse, circulatory function, skeletal-muscular function, eye movement).  For legal and medical purposes, the following definition of death has been proposed.  Broadly speaking, the events that cause our death can be divided into three categories: (1.) "accidental deaths," which result from bodily injuries sustained in events like car accidents, falls, and drowning; (2.) "violent deaths" due to homicide or suicide; and (3.) "natural deaths," which include diseases and passings that occur due to old age.  Death by "natural causes," according to death certificates, is: one that is primarily attributed to an illness or an internal malfunction of the body not directly influenced by external forces.  For example, a person dying from complications from influenza (an infection) or a heart attack (an internal body malfunction) would be listed as having died from natural causes.  Old age is not a scientifically recognized cause of death; there is always a more direct cause, although it may be unknown in certain cases and could be one of a number of aging-associated diseases.  In contrast, death caused by active intervention is called "unnatural death."  The "unnatural" causes are usually given as accident (implying no unreasonable voluntary risk), misadventure (accident following a willful and dangerous risk), suicide, or homicide.  In some settings, other categories may be added.  Additionally, a cause of death can be recorded as "undetermined."  When a person has died, it is also said they are gone or they have passed away, passed on, or expired, among numerous other socially accepted, religiously specific, slang, and irreverent terms.  To understand death at a biological level, we would have to go into the world of thanatology.  Thanatology is a section of Forensic Sciences in which the biological description or academic study of death and dying and the psychological mechanisms of dealing with them (e.g. helping to explain what happens, psychosocially, to individuals in the moment of dying and after-death bodily changes, so that the events that took place at the time of death and post-mortem can be clarified).  Thanatology is the science that studies the events surrounding death, as well as the social, legal, and psychological aspects of death.  This subject encompasses a wide range of disciplines, including the sociology, biology, theology, psychology, economics, and literature surrounding death.  It is primarily an interdisciplinary study offered as a course of study at numerous colleges and universities.  The word is derived from the Greek language.  In Greek mythology, Thanatos (thánatos: "death") is the personification of death.  The English suffix -ology derives from the Greek suffix -logia (-lógia: "speaking" or "for study or discourse").  But when it comes to death, what is it that we find so morbidly interesting?  What is it that we want to know?  The process of it?  The philosophy of it?  What happens to us soon thereafter?  There is a wide range of questions that we curious humans have concerning death.  Probably because nobody has directly experienced it (at least, not knowingly).  And if we do experience biological death, we are unable to live to tell others about it.  Oh sure, you hear stories of people having near-death or out-of-body experiences.  And those experience may have really happened.  I am not 100% skeptical on such experiences.  But did they really biologically "die?"  Did they truly "experience death" biologically?  

You know, after my father pass away last year and we had that dreadfully long cold winter, while experiencing my Cabin Fever, I began an interest in researching death.  It almost became an obsession.  But in that time, I gained a wealth of information that I didn't know before.  It may have even helped me with my grieving process.  There was even information that I was able to pass on to others that may have indirectly helped them through THEIR grieving process.  So, let's start with the basics and move up from there, shall we?  Before we can look at death, let's first look at life...  In the Encyclopedia Britannica, "Life" is defined as: matter that shows certain attributes that include responsiveness, growth, metabolism, energy transformation, and reproduction.  So, "life" is something that occupies space that reacts to stimuli quickly and sympathetically, undergoes a positive change (both physically and abstractly), goes through a set of chemical transformation that is life-sustaining, possesses the strength and vitality required for sustained physical or mental activity (changing one form of to another), and are produced by "parents" and can produce "offspring" by a sexual or asexual process.  Sounds pretty complex, doesn't it?  Hey, that's just the tip of the iceberg.  But one thing is for certain...  From the moment we're born and take our first breath, our bodies are self-sustaining.  As we inhale and exhale; as our blood courses through our arteries and veins; as our cells reproduce over and over again, our bodies are doing everything they can to stay alive.  And by staying healthy, we help our bodies along by keeping them fed and hydrated, maintaining its cleanliness, and so on and so forth.  Amazing, isn't it?  Did you know that your heart will beat about 35 million times in a year?  The expected average life expectancy is roughly 75 to 80 years nowadays.  That means that your heart will beat between 2.625 and 2.8 billion times in a lifetime.  Of course, life expectancy is the expected number of years of life remaining at a given age in a statistical sense.  It is important to note that life expectancy is an average value.  Just because the life expectancy is set to a certain number doesn't mean that one can't exceed or be devoid of this set number.  In other words, you could die at age 35 (or younger) or you could live to be age 95 (or older).  But how do you know if you will live to be bellow the average age, the average age, or above the average age?  The answer?  We don't!  Why?  Because, as mentioned a few paragraphs ago, the timing of death is unknown.  Nobody knows when they're going to die (whether natural or unnatural).  The exact time of death cannot be predicted, nor can the exact manner in which a person will die.  However, we do know a bit about the process that occurs in the days and hours leading up to a Natural Death, and knowing what's going on may be helpful you and in a loved one's last moments.  The last stages of life can be very stressful for the dying person and those caring for him/her.  You will observe changes that may be upsetting and unfamiliar.  Learning about the dying process will help.  After all, that is the question that goes through our minds during those agonizing moments...  What happens to the body while it is "dying?"

THE DYING PROCESS:
Generally, whenever a death is due to terminal illness or senescence, the body goes through changes.  During the dying process, the body's systems shut down.  The dying person has less energy and begins to sleep more and more. The body is conserving the little energy it has, and as a result, needs less nourishment and sustenance.  In the days (or sometimes weeks) before death, people eat and drink less.  They may lose all interest in food and drink, and you shouldn't force them to eat.  That I cannot stress enough.  In fact, pushing food or drink on a dying person could cause him or her to choke, because, at this point, it has become difficult to for them to swallow and the mouth and throat is very dry.  It is hard for most people to respect the dying person’s lack of appetite.  It is important to remember that as the physical body is dying, the vital organs are shutting down, and nourishment is no longer required to keep them functioning.  This is the wisdom of dying, and the body knows exactly what to do.  As the person takes in less food and drink, he or she will urinate less frequently and have fewer bowel movements.  The person may also experience loss of bladder and bowel control.  People who are dying may become confused, agitated or restless, which could be a result of the brain receiving less oxygen.  "Terminal Delirium" is a condition that may be seen when the person is very close to death, marked by extreme restlessness and agitation.  Although it may look distressing, this condition is not considered to be painful.  There are medications available to control symptoms.  Often a day or two or even a few hours before death, the person may have a surge of energy, wakes up, becomes alert, can sometimes eat or talk and can spend some quality time with loved ones.  The person may be alert and talkative.  However, you need to keep in mind that this does not mean that there will be recovery; the person is still dying.  Use this as a "window of opportunity" to say what you need to say and have closure.  This is a very special time for final spiritual practices and mental preparations, which can be shared with loved ones, if it is the dying persons wish.  This is a very precious time because it normally doesn't last long, as most people become unconscious (unresponsive) hours or days before they stop breathing.  Be aware there may be unfinished business.  Dying persons may try to hold on until they feel a sense of security and completion.  The skin will also show the effects of slowing circulation and less oxygen the extremities, and later, the entire body, may be cool to the touch and may turn blue or light gray.  Some skin may exhibit signs of "mottling," which is reddish-blue blotchiness.  This is the result of reduced blood circulation.  As the person gets closer to death, it will become harder and harder to breathe.  Respiration will be noisy and irregular; it will sometimes seem as if the person can't breathe at all.  During this time, many of the dying experience a common phenomena known as Deathbed Visions.  Deathbed Visions refer to a range of paranormal experiences that occur to people who are dying.   Although some dying people report seeing angels and other religious figures (and sometimes even mythical figures), the vast majority claim to see familiar people who had previously passed away.  Very often, the friends and relatives seen in these visions express directly that they have come to help take them away.  The dying person is reassured by the experience and expresses great happiness, reporting to staff working in hospices that the Vision is comforting.  The scientific community consider Deathbed Visions to be "hallucinations."  However, do not judge or be critical of what is the person is experiencing.  Just be as silent and as supportive as possible.  Refrain from discounting the experience and orienting the dying person to "reality."  This IS their reality. Most often, these "Visions" are reassuring, and they comfort the dying.  Rarely do they upset them.  Meanwhile, when there's fluid in the lungs, it can cause a sound known to the ancients as the death rattle.  It may be possible to alleviate the gurgling and congestion by raising the person's head.  If the dying person is experiencing pain, he or she will usually be given medications to manage it.  It's important to remember that every person experiences dying differently.  Some people have the need to say "goodbye" or to hear from another person before death, some don't.  Doctors and other professionals who manage end-of-life care advise loved ones to take their cues from the dying and avoid projecting their own desires or needs onto the person.  They also urge loved ones to continue speaking comfortingly to a dying person — hearing may be one of the last things to go.  Clinical death occurs when the person's heartbeat, breathing and circulation stop.  Four to six minutes later, Biological death occurs.  That's when brain cells begin to die from lack of oxygen, and resuscitation is impossible.  The eyes may open wide and then close, or remain partially open.  The lower jaw muscles may relax and the jaw falls open.  Many people report feeling "cheated" or as if they "let down" a loved one by not being there at the moment of death.  But those who work in hospice think it's the other way around: Passing away often happens minutes after loved ones leave the bedside, as if the dying person is choosing to spare them the final moment.  This is especially true, they say, with individuals toward whom the dying person feels protective.  Signs of death or strong indications that an animal is no longer alive are:

  1. Respiratory Arrest (cessation of breathing), due to failure of the lungs to function effectively, preventing delivery of oxygen to the body.  This lack of oxygen will cause inadequate cerebral perfusion and lead to loss of consciousness and Cardiac Arrest.
  2. Cardiac Arrest (no pulse or heartbeat), abrupt cessation of pump function in the heart, and thus, cessation of normal circulation of the blood due to failure of the heart to contract effectively.  Cardiac arrest is synonymous with Clinical Death.
  3. Pallor Mortis: paleness which happens which happens in those with light/white skin in the first 15–25 minutes after death due to a lack of capillary circulation throughout the body..  It is also known as Postmortem Paleness, which leads to Livor Mortis.
  4. Livor Mortis: a settling of the blood in the lower (dependent) portion of the body, causing a purplish red discoloration of the skin, starts twenty minutes to three hours after death, and is congealed in the capillaries in four to five hours.  It is also known as Postmortem Lividity, Hypostasis, or Suggillation
  5. Algor Mortis: (or the Death Chill): the reduction in body temperature following death. This is generally a steady decline until matching ambient temperature.  Each hour, the body temperature falls about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit (0.83 degrees Celsius) until it reaches room temperature.
  6. Rigor Mortis: the limbs of the corpse become stiff (Latin rigor) and difficult to move or manipulate caused by chemical changes in the muscles after death, anywhere from three to twelve hours after death, and gradually dissipates until approximately 24 hours.
  7. Decomposition: the reduction into simpler forms of matter, accompanied by a strong, unpleasant odor.  Generally, the person is long embalmed and buried by this time.  People who have had to describe such horrific odors, nearly all have stated that the two most recognizable smells combined to make the one body scent are: Ozone and meat.  They say it's like a piece of rotting meat over which someone has sprinkled a few drops of some cheap perfume.
  8. Skeletonization: the last vestiges of the soft tissues of a corpse decayed or dried to the point that the bones of the skeleton are exposed.  By the end of the skeletonization process, all soft tissue will have been eliminated, leaving only disarticulated bones

Various suggestions were made to test for signs of life before burial to avoid the horrifying experience of vivisepulture, ranging from pouring vinegar and pepper into the corpse's mouth to applying red hot pokers to the feet or into the rectum.

Now, notice that after the process of dying, there is a cessation of a lot of things; a stopping and ending of actions.  Are they breathing?  No!  Do they have a heartbeat or pulse?  No!  Do they possess any of the five senses?  No!  Do they move or talk?  No!  They do nothing of the sort.  In fact, they don't really DO anything, do they?  Some say that death is the OPPOSITE of life, just like tall is the opposite of short or fast is the opposite of slow.  But when we talk about an "opposite," we're are talking about something that is totally different from or the reverse of something else.  So, when we talk about tall and short, is there a height present for both?  Yes, there is!  When we talk about fast and slow, is there a speed present for both?  Yes, there is!  That is how you are able to compare them.  Both opposites have an existence and rely on the existence of something else.  The difference?  They are totally different from or the reverse of each other.  But when we talk about a heart beating, or respiration, or movement, or anything that resembles "life," there are no opposites.  There is no opposite of a person breathing.  There is no opposite of a heart beating.  There is no opposite of someone moving around.  When it comes to these actions, they are simply done or not done.  You either breathe or don't breathe.  Your heart either pumps or it doesn't pump.  A person either moves around or they don't move around.  All of the things that you find are not present in a person who has died (i.e. cerebral function on EEG, circulatory function on EKG, skeletal-muscular function on EMG, eye movements on EOG all as flat-line) cannot be considered an opposite because they do not possess an existence, nor do they depend on the existence of something else.  So, after the permanent cessation of all biological functions that sustain a living organism, all of the attributes that would be present in a LIVING organism do not possess an opposite but an absence.  There is an ABSENCE of respiration.  There is an ABSENCE of cerebral function.  There is an ABSENCE of circulatory function.  There is an ABSENCE of skeletal-muscular function.  When you look up a synonym for the adjective: "dead," one of the words you will come up with is "lifeless."  That is, something without life.  So, death is not the opposite of life, it is the absence of it.

When people define life, they find that it is possible to define it in terms of consciousness.  When consciousness ceases, a living organism can be said to have died.  One of the notable flaws in this approach, however, is that there are many organisms which are alive but probably not conscious.  A human being asleep is the best example.  So, even though death is the absence of life, could it be the absence of consciousness, too?  Well, we must first define consciousness.  Consciousness is: the quality or state of being aware of an external object or something within oneself.  It has been defined as: sentience, awareness, subjectivity, the ability to experience or to feel, wakefulness, having a sense of selfhood, and the executive control system of the mind.  In medicine, consciousness is assessed by observing a patient's arousal and responsiveness, and can be seen as a continuum of states ranging from full alertness and comprehension, through disorientation, delirium, loss of meaningful communication, and finally loss of movement in response to painful stimuli.  The English word "conscious" originally derived from the Latin "conscius" (con- "together" + scio "to know" or scius "well-informed"), but the Latin word did not have the same meaning as our word—it meant knowing with, in other words having joint or common knowledge with another.  There were, however, many occurrences in Latin writings of the phrase conscius sibi, which translates literally as: "knowing with oneself," or, in other words, sharing knowledge with oneself about something.  This phrase had the figurative meaning of: knowing that one knows, as the modern English word: "conscious" does.  Many people believe in the existence of a third form of consciousness: universal consciousness.  Universal Consciousness is: a continuation of the unconscious mind, connecting you to your belief system.  It is the sum of all consciousnesses (souls) unified into a single entity moving beyond space and time.  Albert Einstein told us that "everything is energy;" that "a human being is a part of the whole called by us [the] Universe."  Consciousness, as a subjective phenomenon with no physical form, must be a byproduct of the interactions between the various matter that an object is made of.

There is no scientific evidence that suggests consciousness survives the death of an organism.  In human societies, the nature of death and humanity's awareness of its own mortality has for millennia been a concern of the world's religious traditions and of philosophical inquiry.  This includes belief in resurrection (associated with Abrahamic religions), reincarnation or rebirth (associated with Dharmic religions), or that consciousness permanently ceases to exist, known as "external oblivion" (often associated with atheism).  Let's look at each of these...

  • Reincarnation and Rebirth:  The concept that the individual soul survives, after biological death, and begins a new life in a new body (mainly Hinduism and Buddhism).  Reincarnation is connected by the notion of karma:.  But what is Karma anyway?  Teachings on the laws of karma originated in Hinduism, but Buddhists understand karma somewhat differently from Hindus.  The Hindus theory of karma harps on the Newtonian principle that "every action produces an equal and opposite reaction," (i.e. Newton's Third Law of Motion, "Principia Mathematica Philosophiae Naturalis," 1686).  Every time we think or do something, we create a "cause," which in time will bear its "corresponding effects."  And every person is entirely responsible for their own karma.   Hindu philosophy holds the doctrine that if the karma of an individual is good enough, the next birth will be rewarding, and if not, the person may actually devolve and degenerate into a lower life form.  In Buddhism, karma has a more specific meaning, which is volitional or willful action.  Karma is a Sanskrit word that means "action."  Sometimes you might see the Pali spelling, kamma, which means the same thing.  Things we choose to do or say or think set karma into motion.  The law of karma in Buddhism is also a law of cause and effect.  However, a common misconception is that Buddhist (just like Hindus) believe karma is the "result" of something, when karma is actually the "action" of something.  So, for example, if we seem stuck in old, destructive patterns, it may not be the karma of the past that's causing us to be stuck.  If we're stuck, it's more likely that we're re-creating the same old patterns with our present thoughts and attitudes. To change our karma, and change our lives, we have to change our minds.  What does the Holy Bible have to say about reincarnation?  Well, the whole thrust of the Holy Bible opposes reincarnation.  It shows that man is the special creation of God, created in God’s image with both a material body and an immaterial soul and spirit.  He is presented as distinct and unique from all other creaturesangels and the animal kingdom alike.  
  • Atheism:  Atheists believe in the concept of Eternal Oblivion after death.  Eternal Oblivion is the philosophical concept that the individual self "experiences" a state of permanent non-existence ("unconsciousness") after death.  Belief in Eternal Oblivion denies the belief that there is an "afterlife" (such as a Heaven, Purgatory, or Hell), or any state of existence or consciousness after death.  The belief in "eternal oblivion" stems from the idea that the brain creates the mind; therefore, when the brain dies, the mind ceases to exist.  So, after death, you are no more aware that "you ever existed" than you had "knowing you were going to exist" before you were born.  You don't remember the past before you were born because (for you) there was no past to remember.  You were not around.  After you die, not only will all of the memories of your life disappear, you will not be able retain new information of your surroundings because (for you) there will no longer be a functioning brain, and thus, no information to retain.  Although the information will still be there, you won't be able to retain it because (just like before you were born), you will no longer exist.  All that will remain of you is the memories that friends and loved ones have of you.  Some reporters describe this state as "nothingness."  In nontechnical uses, nothing denotes things lacking importance, interest, value, relevance, or significance.  Nothingness is the state of being nothing, the state of nonexistence of anything, or the property of having nothing.  In physics, the word nothing is not used in any technical sense.  A region of space is called a vacuum if it does not contain any matter, though it can contain physical fields.  In fact, it is practically impossible to construct a region of space that contains no matter or fields, since gravity cannot be blocked and all objects at a non-zero temperature radiate electromagnetically.  However, even if such a region existed, it could still not be referred to as "nothing," since it has properties and a measurable existence as part of the quantum-mechanical vacuum.  The Holy Bible teaches that at death, while man’s body is mortal, decays and returns to dust, his soul and spirit continue on either in a place of torments for those who reject Christ or in paradise (i.e Heaven) in God’s presence for those who have trusted in the Savior.  Both categories of people will be resurrected, one to eternal judgment and the other to eternal life with a glorified body (John 5:25-29).
  • Christianity:  In Christianity, death is the separation of body and soul.  There is what is know as an "afterlife," which is is the concept of a transcendental realm in which an essential part of an individual's identity or consciousness continues to exist after the death of the physical body in the individual's lifetime.  So, it may be the end of our (physical) personhood, but not the end of our existence.  When we die, our bodies become lifeless and are no longer the place where we "reside," but we continue to exist as souls, either with Christ in glory or separated from Christ in shame.  There are five main point Christians firmly believe.  First, Believers will be taken into the presence of Christ in Heaven.  Christ is in heaven now (Acts 1:2, 3:21; 1 Thessalonians 1:10, 4:16; 2 Thessalonians 1:7), and Believers will go to be with Him (Isaiah 57:1-2; 1 Corinthians 15:52; 1 Thessalonians 4:17).  Second, Heaven is a place of resplendent glory, and being with Christ in the glory of Heaven will be far superior to our present earthly lives.  Third, when in Heaven we will be continue looking forward (as we should be already in this life) to the resurrection of our bodies from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:52; 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17).  Fourth, at the moment of death, Believers will be made perfect and cleansed from all sin.  And fifth, those who did not trust Christ in this life will be separated from God and enter a reality completely devoid of His common grace and blessing.  Scripture speaks often of the painful reality that awaits those who do not place their faith in Christ to be rescued from sin (Matthew 13:30, 25:41; Luke 12:5; John 3:36; Romans 2:8-9; Hebrews 10:29).  The Holy Bible compares death to sleep more than fifty times.  When we are asleep, we are unconscious; we are not aware of the passing of time or of what is going on around us.  That is what death is like as well.  The Holy Bible says: "for the living know that they will die; but the dead know nothing… their love, their hatred, and their envy have now perished." (Psalm 146:4 & 115:17; Ecclesiastes 9:5) (NKJV).  Many Christians say that the soul is an immortal entity within us that goes on living after death.  "Then the Lord God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being." (Genesis 2:7).  So, God breathed His life-giving spirit into the lifeless body Adamand the result was a soul, or a living being.  When a person dies, the reverse takes place. The "breath of life" departs from the body, and the soul continues to exist.  "The dust returns to the ground it came from, and the spirit returns to God who gave it." (Ecclesiastes 12:7).  Your spirit no longer dwells within your physical body. "We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord." (2 Corinthians 5:8).  As Believers who accept Jesus as our Lord and Savior (Isaiah 53:5; 2 Corinthians 5:21), we receive what is called "eternal life," which is: the life everlasting in the presence of God (Matthew 19:29, 25:46; John 3:15-16, 3:36, 4:14, 4:36, 5:24, 6:40, 6:47, 6:54, 10:28, 12:25, 12:50, 17:2-3; Acts 13:46, 13:48; Romans 2:7, 5:21, 6:22-23; Galatians 6:8; 1 Timothy 1:16, 6:12; Titus 1:2, 3:7; 1 John 1:2, 2:25, 3:15, 5:11, 5:13, 5:20; and Jude 1:21).  Jesus said in John 11:25: "I am the resurrection and the life.  He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live."   

So, according to the Holy Bible, God created everything.  On the fifth day, He created all the creatures of the Earth (Genesis 1:21).  He made mankind in His image (Genesis 1:26-28).  He breathed "the breath of life" into the first human being, Adam (Genesis 2:7), let Adam name all of the other creatures of the Earth (Genesis 2:19), then God made the first woman, Eve (Genesis 2:22-23).  God’s creation was without blemish, defect, disease, suffering, or death.  There was no "survival of the fittest."  Animals did not prey on each other.  The original creation was a beautiful place, full of life and joy in the presence of the Creator.  It wasn't until Genesis 3:6 when Adam and Eve ate from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil that death even entered into the picture of mankind.  Genesis 3:17-18 reveal that the ground was cursed.  Thorns and thistles were now part of the world.  Animals were cursed, the serpent more than the rest (Genesis 3:14).  The woman was cursed with "severe painful childbirth" and have "her husband to rule over her" (Genesis 3:16).  The man was cursed by having all humans work for their food "by the sweat of their brow" and until they "return to the ground," since from it they "were taken" (Genesis 3:19).  This is where death came into play.  The last of Genesis 3:19 states: "for dust you are and to dust you will return."  And the Old Testament reiterates this, at least, five times in Job 34:15, Psalm 90:3, Psalm 104:29, Ecclesiastes 3:20 & 12:7.  The world was no longer perfect but sin-cursed.  Suffering and death was now abounded in that once-perfect Creation.  And so many times, when tragedies happen and things go wrong, man's usual response to tragedy is to blame God.  Charles Darwin, who was best known for his contribution to the Theory of Evolution, blamed God for the death his beloved (precocious and inquisitive) daughter: Annie Elizabeth at the age of 10 on April 23, 1851.  In 1849, Annie caught scarlet fever along with her two sisters, and her health thereafter declined.  Her death was a terrible blow for to Charles and his devoutly religious wife: Emma.  This is completely understandable because there is nothing natural about having to "bury your child," and how devastating it can be on the marriage of any couple who loses a child.  Charles wrote in a personal memoir: "We have lost the joy of the household, and the solace of our old age; she must have known how much we loved her; oh that she could now know how deeply, how tenderly we do still & and shall ever love her dear joyous face.  Blessings on her." (Annie's Box: Charles Darwin, his Daughter, and Human Evolution by Randal Keynes, 2001).  In a 1991 biography "Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist ," A. Desmond and J. Moore stated on page 387 that: "Annie’s cruel death destroyed Charles’s tatters of beliefs in a moral, just universe.  Later he would say that this period chimed the final death-knell for his Christianity....  Charles now took his stand as an unbeliever."  Madalyn Murray O'Hair, the founder of the American Atheists, was angry with God because the father of her (as yet) unborn child would not leave his wife for her.  In fact, during her pregnancy in the early spring of 1946 strode outside in a Midwestern violent electrical thunderstorm, alone, and challenged God to strike her and her unborn child dead, waving her first and cursing God, unleashing blasphemies intended to provoke violent wrath from God.  As time went on, Madalyn became angrier with God over the choices she had made for herself and the consequences of those choices.  Keep in mind that this is the very God that she, for decades, strongly proclaimed didn't even exist.  She fought the U.S. Supreme Court to take prayer out of schools and was even branded "the most hated woman in America."  And she thrived on that!  She even once said: "I want three words: Woman, Atheist, Anarchist.  That's me."  Still, she was consumed with hatred and anger against a God that she claimed didn't exist.  In fact,  Bryan F. LeBeau quoted Madalyn in his biography saying: "We find God to be sadistic, brutal and a representation of hatred." (The Atheist, page 85).  It's almost as if her very hatred for God manifested her belief in God.  After all, how can you express utter contempt for a God who doesn't exist?

Nevertheless, not all atheists have been scorned in life and not all scientists deny the existence of God.  Still, this raises a question from Believer and non-Believers alike...  If it was Adam and Eve's decision to disobey God that brought sin into the world, why do we all have to suffer punishment?  That's a pretty legitimate question, wouldn't you say?  I mean, none of US ate the apple, right?  Why should WE be punished for something that a couple of people did thousands of years ago?...  Well, let me ask you THIS...  When you look in the mirror, what do you see?  Most likely, you're going to say: "I see myself," right?  But the question wasn't "Who do you see?," it was "What do you see?"  I'll tell you what I see when I look in the mirror...  I see that I have two dimples in the same place on my forehead as my father.  I see that I have his eye structure and his nose.  I also see that I have my mother's mouth and my maternal grandfather's build on my upper torso.  When I look at my left wrist, I see that I have a mole on the exact spot as my mother has on HER left wrist.  How did it all get there?  I "inherited" it!  I didn't ASK for any of these physical traits, they were "passed down" to me through heredity.  Heredity is: the passing of traits to offspring from its parents or ancestor.  This is the process by which an offspring cell or organism acquires or becomes predisposed to the characteristics of its parent cell or organism.  After Adam and Eve sinned and were banished from the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3:20–24), they began to have children.  Each child "inherited" Adam and Eve’s sinful nature, and each child rebelled against his or her Creator (i.e. God).  Every human is a descendant of Adam and Eve, born with the same problem: a sinful nature.  When Adam and Eve sinned, the Lord cursed the Universe.  In essence, there was a change, and along with that change God began to uphold the Creation in a cursed state.  Suffering and death entered into His creation.  The whole universe now suffers from the effects of sin (Romans 8:22).  As children of Adam and Eve, we all "inherit" their sinful nature.  We have all, at some point, disobeyed a command from God, so we all deserve to die and suffer eternal punishment in Hell.  We must understand that not one of us is innocent before God (Romans 3:23).  Not one of us is worthy to stand before the Creator of the Universe because we would each bring a sinful, rebellious nature into His presence.  No, we didn't ASK for it.  It was "inherited."  So, you may ask: "So, that's why God created death?"  The answer?  No, because God didn't create death.  Sin created death.  Look closely at your Catechism, my friends.  It will clearly tells you that God is not the creator of death.

Catechism 413 states: "God did not make death, and he does not delight in the death of the living. . . It was through the devil's envy that death entered the world."  In Catechism 416-418, it states: "By his sin Adam, as the first man, lost the original holiness and justice he had received from God, not only for himself but for all human beings.  Adam and Eve transmitted to their descendants human nature wounded by their own first sin and hence deprived of original holiness and justice; this deprivation is called: 'original sin.'  As a result of original sin, human nature is weakened in its powers, subject to ignorance, suffering and the domination of death, and inclined to sin (this inclination is called: 'concupiscence')."  You see, for Christians, concupiscence refers to what they understand as: the orientation, inclination or innate tendency of human beings to long for fleshly appetites, often associated with a desire to do things which are proscribed.  Where was Adam prior to his creation?  The answer is simple: he did not yet exist.  Does that mean he was dead?  No, he had not yet lived.  However, once his life ceased, he was dead.  There has to be LIFE (some form of existence) first before there can be death.  Adam and Eve were created alive, and were created to live forever in their physical bodies.  We go on to read in Genesis 2:15-17: "The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it.  And the Lord God commanded the man, 'You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.'"  Now, here is where we start getting to the point.  God told Adam and Eve they "would surely die" in the day they ate of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.  So, did God create death that day?  No, but God created LIFE, and the day Adam and Eve disobeyed God, the life God created in Adam and Eve ceased to exist.  Adam didn't die physically in the very same day that he ate from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.  In fact, he fathered Cain, Abel, Seth and other children and lived a total of 930 years.  Now, it may be true that the natural aging process we experience began in Adam on that day, but in order for God's Word to be accurate, the idea of death has to mean something other than cessation of biological life.  It's important to remember that in the Holy Bible, death always speaks of separation, not annihilation.  Sometimes this can mean separating the soul from the body as in "physical death."  But it can also mean separating the soul from God, which is defined as "spiritual death" or "dead in our sins" (Colossians 2:13 and Ephesians 2:5).  The consequence of The Fall in the Garden of Eden was the entrance of sin into the world,  The penalty of death into the world for humans is a spiritual one (and a physical one, God removed the Tree of Life, which we see returns in the New Creation in Romans 5:12 and Revelation 22.)  So, you see, our "physical death" is the consequence of our sin, not the payment for it.  It was Jesus’ death on the Cross that was the payment for our sin.  Proverbs 10:16 says: "The wages of the righteous is life, but the earnings of the wicked are sin and death."  This is further reiterated and reversed in the Romans 6:23 when it says: "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."  Unfortunately for us, the effects of our sin continue even after we have been forgiven.  If the effects of sin were to stop in forgiveness, then we should also not have any sickness, plagues, deformities, death of animals, etc.  All of these things, which are the consequences of sin, should likewise disappear.  But, they have not because Jesus' death on the cross bought us "spiritual life" with God.  He purchased us from the death that is separation from God due to our sin (Isaiah 59:2).  He bore our sins in His body on the cross (1 Peter 2:24) so that we could be justified by faith (Romans 5:1).  The result is having eternal life with Him (Romans 6:23; John 3:16 & 10:27-28).

This would lead us to our next question, which is: "Okay, what about unnatural deaths?  This may explain why we die of old age or of a terminal illness.  What about murder?  What about suicide?  Unintentional drug overdoses?  Car accidents?  Plane crashes?  Misadventures?  Adverse outcome to surgery?  Death during childbirth?  How could a loving God allow such things to happen?  If we are all destined to die, why would God such unnatural deaths a person's final destiny on Earth?"  Did the psalmist not write in Psalm 31:15: "My times are in your hands;?" In other words, the length of our life and when we will die are up to God and as we see in Psalm 139 and Acts 17:26, God has already ordained and established what the length of our life will be even before we are born.  By faith, we know we must put our life into God’s hands and not try to act on our own.  The Lord will take our life when it is the right time according to his plans for us.  Unfortunately, this has made many people misunderstand what the Scriptures mean, say for example, if a person is murdered or commits suicide and they say "It was their time" or "It was God's will."  The truth is: murder and suicide are not God-pleasing deaths.  In fact, they are forbidden by the Sixth Commandment  (Exodus 20:13 & Deuteronomy 5:17) and punished by God (Matthew 5:21).  Murdering a person or committing suicide (self-murder) is a sin committed against Christ, while preserving a person’s life is an act of kindness to Christ Himself.  Human life has value and divine sanctity, being a time of grace to come to God for mercy and salvation.  Isaiah 55:6-7, Acts 17:26, and Hebrews 9:27 make it clear that a person’s life is so valuable to Him because his life is the time the Lord gives him to repent of his sins and to believe in Jesus Christ for his Salvation.  His life is his time of grace.  When he is dead and has not accepted Christ as his Lord and Savior, it is too late for him to be saved, for then he has met his judgment.

But what about the other unnatural deaths?  Well, that's where free will kind of comes into play.  King Solomon himself did say that there was a time and a season for everything.  In fact, in Ecclesiastes 3:2, he says that there is: "a time to be born and a time to die..."  And due to the fact that God gave humans a free will to choose or not to choose to follow Christ, not all deaths are natural.  Also, remember, God does not want us to know the future.  And the future includes how, where, and when we will die.  Ecclesiastes 8:8 says that: "As no one has power over the wind to contain it, so no one has power over the time of their death."  King Solomon further tells us in Ecclesiastes 9:12: "For man no more knows his own time: as fish taken in a fatal net, and as birds caught in a snare, Like these, the children of men are taken when the time falls suddenly upon them."  Why?  Look at the ending to the verse before it.  It says: "time and chance happen to them all" ("all" being "every human").  The Voice Translation says: "time and  MISFORTUNE happen to them all" and the NLT says: "It is all decided by chance, by being in the right place at the right time."  So, even though God foreknows everything, does He really predetermine everything?  The truth is: He foreknows things that are dependent on us, but He does not necessarily predetermine them.  He neither wills evil to occur nor forces virtue on anybody.  What God DOES predetermine are things which are NOT dependent on us, according to His foreknowledge (i.e. the things He has already judged, according to His goodness and righteousness).   So, no matter how, where, and when you will die; it was NOT God's will.  My father died of a terminal illness.  That was not His will.  People are killed in car accidents and plane crashes, are murdered, or commit suicide.  That is not His will.  What IS God's will is that when you DO die, you go to be with Him and Jesus in Heaven; in paradise (Luke 23:42-43) for eternity.  Remember what Jesus promised.  "Do not let your hearts be troubled.  My Father’s house has many rooms; if that were not so, would I have told you that I am going there to prepare a place for you?  And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am." (John 14:1-3).  And where is Jesus?  Heaven!  Heaven is a place free of sin!  After all, true freedom isn't freedom to sin, but freedom from sin.  The Apostle Paul really "nailed it" when he said in Philippians 1:21: "For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain."  Always remember, my friends, whether we believe in Him or not, God sees us as His.  And once we accept Christ into our hearts, we become "children of God through faith..." (Galatians 3:26)  "If we live, we live for the Lord; and if we die, we die for the Lord.  So, whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord." (Romans 14:8).

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Through God's eyes: "A journey across Infinity"

Isn't it amazing how, each night, the Universe stares down and challenges us to understand it?  However, the infinite Universe is something far beyond our finite minds to comprehend.  It is something that may not have a beginning or an end.  If it does what is beyond it?  Heaven!  Okay, then what is beyond Heaven?  Nothing!  Okay, then what is beyond Nothing?  Now, you may be thinking: "What?  What are you getting at?  How could 'Something' or 'Anything,' for that matter, be beyond 'Nothing?'"  Well, generally, when we look at "infinity," one thing is for certain: there is always "something" beyond "something else."  The question is: what and how far?  You see, the finite mind can easily state what infinity is (academically), yet it cannot possibly grasp something which has no beginning, no middle, and no end.  We would be very foolish to say that the Universe does not exist simply because it is beyond our complete understanding.  Similarly, an infinite God is far beyond human understanding.  Our finite minds cannot possibly comprehend a Being who has no beginning or end, is all-powerful, all-knowing and is everywhere at the same time.  It is impossible for our finite minds to academically grasp Him.  Consequently, many are quick to state: "God does not exist."  However, we cannot reject God (and still remain objective) just because He doesn't conveniently fit within our limited range of understanding.  If we do, we should equally state: "The Universe does not exist."  Isaiah 40:12-14 says:  "Who has measured the waters in the hollow of his hand, or with the breadth of his hand marked off the heavens?  Who has held the dust of the earth in a basket, or weighed the mountains on the scales and the hills in a balance?  Who can fathom the Spirit of the Lord, or instruct the Lord as his counselor?  Whom did the Lord consult to enlighten him, and who taught him the right way?  Who was it that taught him knowledge, or showed him the path of understanding?"  Hebrews 11:3 says: "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God’s command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible."  Imagine that you are a Computer Programmers creating programs that encompass entire cyber worlds.  In so doing, you as the programmer are not subject to any of the boundaries they have instigated for computer-generated characters locked in their cyber world, right?  God has created a colossal program Himself — the Universe!  Within it, He has written boundaries (i.e. Laws of time, space, and science) to which every creature is subject.  Just like the Computer Programmer, He that created the universal program is not subject to the program’s boundaries.  The Universe is subordinate to its Creator.  As programmers are outside their program God is outside the Laws of time, space, and science that He created.  It is impossible for a human's finite mind to fully grasp an infinite Being.  Trying to fit God into our limited understanding is like a computer-generated-character trying to comprehend its programmer.  All we need to remember is that the Laws of time, space, and science are subordinate to the Creator not the other way round.  At any moment, God can change a boundary if it suits His purpose — we call this act a miracle (Genesis 1:1).

Sometimes we get so caught up in the stresses of everyday life, we tend to forget that we are not the "center of the world."  In fact, it took astronomers like Nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo Galilei to bring an end to geocentrism, "put us in our place," and prove the fact that the Sun was the center of our Solar System, not the Earth.  We have also discovered within the past several centuries that our planet is not alone; that there are other planets that orbit the Sun and that there are other galaxies adjacent to our's.  Then, with the help of Orbiters, Rovers, Landers, and even manned explorations during the late 20th and early 21st century, we have discovered more and more about those other planets and their moons, in addition to the hundreds of billions of other galaxies that are in our Universe.  As far WE know for now, our Earth is the only habitable planet, since all of the other planets seem to be too big, too cold, too gaseous, or have gravity problems that scorch their oceans and, thus, cannot support life.  Still, our finite yet curious human minds thirst for the knowledge of just how big our Universe is.  We hunger for an understanding of what our place, meaning, and purpose in our Universe is.  To even come close to these realizations, we would have to look at everything through God's eyes.  To even begin to help you understand the vastness of our cosmos, we're going to start with something elementary.  And I mean REALLY elementary.  Okay, let's start with some arithmetic, since it is the most elementary branch of mathematics.  We all learned it in Elementary School.  It deals with numbers and their addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

  • Say you were driving a car at 30 miles per hour (mph), since we general think in terms of miles per hour (mps).  And say that you intend to drive that car 30 miles from where you start.  How long will it take you to reach that destination?... An HOUR, right?  Makes sense, doesn't it?  You drive for 30 miles at 30 mph, it will take you an hour to get there, right?
  • Okay, now let's say that you were driving that same car on the highway at 60 mph, but still driving the same distance (30 miles) from where you start.  How long will it take you to reach THAT destination?... A HALF AN HOUR, right?  So, you traveled the same distance at twice the speed and reached your destination in half the time... With me so far?
  • Okay, let's go further.  Say you get a little stupid, high, drunk, suicidal, or whatever and you were driving that same car on the highway at 150 mph, but still going the same distance (30 miles).  At the risk of being pulled over by a State Trooper, killing other people on the highway, or even killing yourself, how long would it take for you to reach THAT destination (assuming you make it there alive and in tact)?... FIVE MINUTES, right?  So, you traveled the same distance at five times the speed and reached your destination in one fifth of the time.  Do you see a pattern emerging here?

So, we are able to say conclusively that if we were to travel at a FASTER SPEED at a destination that is the same distance, we can arrive there in LESS TIME.  That's not too difficult to understand, is it?  Now, let's go a step further.

For centuries, we human beings have been trying to get from Point A to Point B faster by inventing travel devices that can get them there in less time.  And with the evolution of technology, we've been quite successful.  In Mesopotamia, the first wheeled vehicles in history (e.g. the chariot & river boat) were invented in 3,500 BC.  Horses are domesticated and used for transportation by 2,000 BC.  By 1492, Leonardo da Vinci was the first to seriously theorize about flying machines.  In 1620, Cornelis Drebbel invented the first submarine.  Forty-two years later, the first public bus - horse-drawn, regular route, schedule, and fare system was invented by none other then the famous Blaise Pascal.  The first Steamboat was invented in 1787.  Three years later, the modern bicycle was invented.  In 1814, George Stephenson invented the first practical steam powered railroad locomotive "Blutcher" at Killingworth Colliery.  By 1871, the first Cable Car was invented.  A dozen years later, Karl Benz invents the first car powered by an internal combustion engine.  Eleven years after that, the first motorcycle was available to the public for purchase by Hildebrand & Wolfmüller. By 1903, The Wright Brothers invent and fly the first engined airplane.  Five years later, Henry Ford improves the assembly line for automobile manufacturing with the introduction of the Ford Model T.  By 1964, Bullet Train transportation had been invented.  On July 20, 1969, we had our first manned mission (Apollo 12) to the Moon.  By 1981, our flight of the first Space Shuttle launched.  The Channel Tunnel opened in 1994.  Then, the first privately funded human spaceflight (a.k.a. the first space of Space) happened on June 21, 2004.

Yeah, technology evolves quite quickly in our world.  Inventions like the VCR were once high tech.  Now, with the invention of DVD's and DVR's, they have become as obsolete as records and cassette tapes.  Heck, the VCR became obsolete before many of us learned how to program one.  Remember how exciting it was when home video first came out?  Back in the 80's, a video camera (containing a beta tape) would have cost you $1,000 or more. Then, after the invention of the DVD in 1997 and Blu-ray Disc in 2006, sales of video cameras and other recording equipment plummeted.  Nowadays, advances in computer technology allowed computers to capture, store, edit, and even transmit video clips.  And yet, technology continues to evolve more and more as time thrust forward.  For lot's of people, future technology is the most exciting.  A very popular one is Quantum Teleportation (a.k.a.The Transporter).  Quantum Teleportation is the name given by science fiction writers to the feat of making an object or person disintegrate in one place while a perfect replica appears somewhere else.  Pretty cool, isn't it?  What kind of technology is required to scramble a person's atoms and send them for regrouping in foreign lands all in the blink of an eye?  Imagine: I could work in Tokyo, relax after work in Maui, sleep in Paris, spend my weekends in Key West, and spend most of my retirement years in the relaxed community and black-and-white-sanded beach town of Coronado, Panama.  Beam me up, Scottie!

But I digress... We see that driving a car will get us to our destination faster than "The Heal-Toe Express."  We see that taking a bus, a boat, or a train may get us somewhere even faster than a car (depending on where you're going).  And, of course, we see that the fastest of all of these is flying in an airplane.  After all, we are trying to evolve our transportation system due to the knowledge that: if we were to travel at a FASTER SPEED at a destination that is the same distance, we can arrive there in LESS TIME.  And, therefore, we are trying to find ways of arriving at our destinations in LESS TIME by traveling at a FASTER SPEED.  So, the next question is: what is the fastest speed known in the world of physics?... Well, if you know you're Science very well, you would know that it is: THE SPEED OF LIGHT.  In 1905, Albert Einstein postulated that the SPEED OF LIGHT with respect to any inertial frame is independent of the motion of the light source, and explored the consequences of that postulate by deriving the Special Theory of Relativity.  There is no known motion (or speed) beyond THE SPEED OF LIGHT.  But keep something in mind... That is only in theory.

Only a century ago, traveling at THE SPEED OF SOUND was also a part of theoretical physics and aerodynamics.  Humans wanted to see if the could travel at the SPEED OF SOUND and still survive to tell the story.  THE SPEED OF SOUND, at that point, was a barrier.  Like the SPEED OF LIGHT, it was only "in theory" that we could travel at the SPEED OF SOUND.  A Sound Barrier (at that time) was: a hypothetical barrier to fly beyond the speed of sound.  Now, I'm no pilot and I'm not going to talk about ALL four of the fundamental forces in aerodynamics (i.e. Weight, Lift, Drag, and Thrust).  However, it was the "drag force" that was the main barrier to flying faster the SPEED OF SOUND.  This was postulated because aircrafts undergo an abruptly increasing drag force induced by compression of the surrounding air when traveling near the SPEED OF SOUND.  Remember Newton's Third Law of Motion: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.  And what IS "drag," exactly?  Well, drag is: the aerodynamic force that opposes an aircraft's motion through the air or fluid.  So, drag is that "equal and opposite reaction" to the aircraft flying forward (i.e. the opposing aerodynamic force of "Thrust").  Think of yourself riding along in a car.  If you stick your hand out of a car window while moving, you'll experience a very simple demonstration of drag at work.  The amount of drag that your hand creates depends on a few factors (e.g. the size of your hand, the speed of the car, and the density of the air).  If you were to slow down, you would notice that the drag on your hand would decrease.  So, in terms of physics, drag is a mechanical force and is, therefore, a Vector Quantity having both a magnitude and a direction.  So, for drag to be generated, the solid body must be in contact with the air or fluid.  If there is no air or fluid, there is no drag. Nevertheless, the consequences of traveling at the SPEED OF SOUND and faster was purely speculation; conjectures of great scientists of their time.  It took some time.  But then, while flying the experimental Bell X-1 at an altitude of 45,000 feet on October 14, 1947, an Air Force Captain test pilot at Muroc Army Air Field (now Edwards Air Force Base) named: Chuck Yeager became the first person break the Sound Barrier.  He was the first person to not only fight at THE SPEED OF SOUND but actually flew a smidgen faster (i.e. Mach 1.07).  Therefore, they had to make up a name for THE SPEED OF SOUND.  They called it: a Mach or Mach 1.  The Mach number is named after an Austrian physicist and philosopher named: Ernst Mach, proposed by an aeronautical engineer named: Jakob Ackeret.  Kind of coincidental, since the word: "mach" is German for the transitive second-person singular imperative form of "machen," meaning "to do" or "to make."  So, Mach 1 is THE SPEED OF SOUND.  Mach 2 is twice the SPEED OF SOUND.  Mach 3 is three times the SPEED OF SOUND, and so on and so forth.  So, how fast is THE SPEED OF SOUND?  Well, as I've mentioned, since we general think in terms of miles per hour, that is how we will measure the SPEED OF SOUND.

The answer to how fast Mach 1 is in miles per hour is not an exact science, due to the variables involved in calculation.  The figures can vary depending on altitude, humidity, and whether we are measuring in the air or in water.  A good basic number -- Mach 1 = 761.207051 miles per hour, which is 12.6867842 miles per minute.  So, THE SPEED OF SOUND is over 761 mph or about 13 miles per minute.  Pretty fast, isn't it?  Well, as the old cliché goes: "You ain't seen nothin' yet."  But for now, we'll stick with the SPEED OF SOUND.  Let's first give you a good idea about how fast the SPEED OF SOUND (i.e. Mach 1) really is.

  • So, say you wanted to fly at Mach 1 FROM Estcourt Station, Maine, 04741 TO San Iysidro, California, 92143.  The distance between those two cities in the United States is: 3,215.36 miles.  If you were to travel at Mach 1, you would arrive at San Iysido in 3.5280939 hours (roughly 3 hours and 32 minutes).
  • Now, say you wanted to fly at Mach 1 FROM Cape Chelyuskin, Russia TO Pedra Branca, Australia.  The distance between these two points in the world is: 8,579.98 miles.  If you were to travel at Mach 1, you would arrive at Pedra Branca in 11.271545 hours (roughly 11 hours and 16 minutes).
  • Now, say you wanted to fly at Mach 1 FROM the North Pole TO the South Pole.  The distance between the two poles is: 12,450.73 miles.  If you were to travel at Mach 1 from one point of the word the the other, you would arrive at the South Pole in 16.356561 hours (roughly 16 hours and 21 minutes).
  • Now, let's think in terms of around the world.  Traveling at THE SPEED OF SOUND, how long will it take us to fly around the Earth?  Well, if you wanted to fly around the Earth the quickest way, it's faster to fly past the poles than to go around the equator.  So, if you were to measure around the Earth, passing through the poles, it's 24,859.82 miles around.  So, if you were to fly around the Earth (past the poles) at Mach 1 FROM the North Pole, go around the South Pole and back to the North Pole again, it would take you 32.65842 hours (roughly 1 day, 8 hours, and 40 minutes) (Revolutions = speed / circumference).

Not bad, huh?  Around the world in less than a day and a half!  But true scientists and test pilots do not stop at tying to find new discoveries.  According to the Guinness Book of World Records, on November 16, 2004, NASA's X-43A, using an experimental engine called: scramjet, hit Mach 9.6 (or 7,307.586733824 mph) (nearly 10 times the SPEED OF SOUND) (roughly 2 miles per second) at an altitude of nearly 109,000 feet (almost 21 miles) over the Pacific Ocean.  Of course, this was an unmanned aircraft, but it was a world record just the same.

  • At that speed, a trip FROM New York TO Los Angeles would take about 20 minutes.  So, there would be no need for a flight attendant to give you anything to drink while you flying "United NASA," so to speak.  
  • And it would only take you 3.40191925262 hours to fly around the Earth (roughly 3 hours and 24 minutes).  Wow!   A complete 360° around the Earth and you wouldn't even have to take any luggage.  No checking of bags or even bringing a carry-on would be necessary.  Not bad.  Not bad at all.  
  • In fact, we've gone faster than THAT; however, in order to do it, we had to leave the Earth.  But that is a GOOD thing.  Because even without the drag force (since there is not air in outer space), at the SPEED OF SOUND, it would take you 13.0823 days (13 days, 1 hour, 58 minutes, and 30.72 seconds) to get to the Moon and 7.1935993214295 years (7 years, 2 months, 1 week, 12 days, 8 hours, 2 minutes, and 56 seconds) to get to Mars.  Don't worry, though.  We have space vehicles that can go much faster than that.  On January 19, 2006, the robotic spacecraft: New Horizons (which is part of the New Frontiers program) was launched with an Earth-relative velocity of about 36,373 mph (or Mach 47.7833198631) (nearly 48 times THE SPEED OF SOUND).  Thus, it left Earth at the fastest speed ever recorded.  It will arrive at Pluto on July 14, 2015, then continue into the Kuiper Belt.  
But we're not done yet, are we?  Oh no!  We human beings love a challenge.  We are obsessed with speed, and even the rate at which we break our own records is astounding.  Ecclesiastes 1:8 tells us that: "Everything is wearisome beyond description.  No matter how much we see, we are never satisfied.  No matter how much we hear, we are not content." (NLT)  We humans are curious creatures.  The more we learn, the more we want to learn.

Ever since the Sound Barrier was broken, people have been asking: "Why can’t we break the Light Barrier, too?  What’s the big difference?"  It is too soon to tell if the Light Barrier can be broken, but one thing is certain it’s an entirely different problem than breaking the Sound Barrier.  You see, the Sound Barrier was broken by an object that was made of matter, not sound.  The atoms and molecules that make up matter are connected by electromagnetic fields, the same stuff that light is made of.  In the case of the Light Barrier, the thing that’s trying to break the barrier is made up of the same stuff as the barrier itself.  How can an object travel faster than that which links its atoms?  Like I said, it’s an entirely different problem than breaking the Sound Barrier.  The bad news is that the bulk of scientific knowledge that we have accumulated as of now concludes that faster than light travel is impossible. This is an artifact of Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity.  Most people think it's a difficult theory to understand, but it's really not.  There are only two rules to it, one of which we already talked about.

  1. Rule #1 is simple.  The distance you’ll travel (d) depends on how fast you move (v), for how long you’re moving (t).  Remember the first example I gave with driving a car at 30 miles per hour (mph)?  If you were driving 30 mph for one hour, you will have covered 30 miles, right? You drive for 30 miles at 30 mph, it will take you an hour to get there, right?  Rule #1 is just that simple.
  2. It's Rule #2 that is mind-boggling to people.  The Rule is: No matter how fast you’re moving, you’ll always see the speed of light as being the same.

When you combine these together and compare what one traveler "sees" relative to another traveler at a different speed - that’s when the problems come into play.  Imagine that the only sense that you had was the sense of "hearing."  All that you know are sounds.  You identify things by how they sound.  So, when a train goes by, did its horn really change?  We know that the horn was always tooting the same tone, but it was the train’s motion that made it appear to change because of something called the Doppler Shift.  It's a similar situation with light.  Everything we know around us we know by light, or more generally, Electromagnetism.  What we see, what we feel (the air molecules bouncing off our skin), what we hear (air molecules bouncing off each other in waves of pressure), even the propagation of time, are all governed by electromagnetic forces.  So, when we start moving at speeds approaching the speed by which we are getting all our information, our information gets distorted.  In principle, it’s that simple.  Understanding it well enough to do something about it well, that’s a different matter.

In modern physics, light is regarded as the fastest thing in the Universe, and its velocity in empty space as a fundamental constant of nature.  Now, there are some differences between SOUND and LIGHT.  Remember the First Law of Thermodynamics: Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed.  Well, LIGHT and SOUND are two shapes and kinds of energy.  When energy changes its form from one type to another, its characteristics also change.  There are two main differences between sound and light waves.  First, in speed, sound waves travels at over 1,116 feet per second, whereas light waves travel at around 186,282.397 miles per second.  And second, sound requires a solid, liquid or gaseous medium to travel, but light can travel through empty space (i.e. a vacuum).  The denser the medium, the greater the speed of sound, whereas the opposite is true of light.  Light travels around a third slower in water than in air, sound travels through all substances but light will not pass through anything that is opaque.  Sound is the disturbance of mechanical energy traveling through an elastic medium (transmitted through various materials and responsible for the sense of hearing), and moves through matter as a wave.  Without matter, sound cannot exist.  It is the properties of a sound wave that characterize sound namely frequency, wavelength, period, amplitude, and speed.  Sound is basically changing of pressures and light is electromagnetic energy. You can't hear anything in space because there is no air or mass for the impulse to move through.  Light is electromagnetic radiation (visible to the human eye which protrudes the sense of sight).  This wave travels the fastest when there is no matter present.   Sound cannot travel through vacuum, whereas light can.  Properties of light include: intensity, propagation direction, frequency or wavelength spectrum, speed and polarization.  Light has dual properties of wave as well as particle.  Light does not require a specific medium to travel and, hence, light can be seen even in space.

Now, as we mentioned, the SPEED OF SOUND is over 761 mph or about 13 miles per minute.  However, the SPEED OF LIGHT in a perfect vacuum is about 670,616,629 mph or almost 11,176,943.82 miles per minute.  That's over 880,991 times the SPEED OF SOUND.  To put it morel simply, LIGHT travels immensely faster than SOUND.  With that being that case, because we are now going to talk about momentum involving the SPEED OF LIGHT, we will have to change our perspective from miles per hour to miles per second.  That would keep the numbers smaller and easier to comprehend.  Generally, we measure this by units of parsecs (i.e. about 3.26 light years) and gigaparsecs (i.e. a billion parsecs), which is the largest measurement of distance there is.  Also, when you work with calculations dealing with the SPEED OF LIGHT, we need to use "nature's yard stick," since light is measured in distance, rather than time (although time is in the equation).  For example, we will look at distance in terms of "light years."  What is a light year?  Well, it's basically what it sounds like.  A light year is: the distance light travels through the vacuum of space in one year.  How long does it take?  One year (i.e. the time).  And what about the distance?  The distance of a light year is 5 trillion 900 billion miles.  It is often rounded up to 6 trillion miles in a year or that a "light year" equals a distance of 6 trillion miles.  Hey, what’s a hundred billion when you’re talking about almost 6 trillion?  Now, let's give you a good idea about how fast the SPEED OF LIGHT really is.
The SPEED OF LIGHT in a perfect vacuum is = 186,282.397 miles per second.  1 Light speed (or c) is equal to 881,742.52352941 Ma (Machs).  That is, if you wanted to travel at the SPEED OF LIGHT through the perspective of THE SPEED OF SOUND, you would have to travel at Mach 881,742 and then some (over 881,742 times the SPEED OF SOUND).

  • In one second, light will make 60 trips between New York and Los Angeles.
  • In one second, light will make roughly 15 trips between the North Pole and the South Pole.
  • What about around the Earth?  To know this, you would need to know the circumference of the Earth at the equator, since the Earth is a tad wider than it is tall.  The circumference of the earth at the equator is: 24,901.55 miles.  If you were to travel around the Earth’s equator (the longer way around) at the SPEED OF LIGHT, you will travel around the entire planet Earth 7.48 times in approximately one second (Revolutions = speed / circumference).
  • The distance from the Earth to the Moon is about 239,000 miles.  If you were to travel that distance at the SPEED OF LIGHT, you would arrive at the Moon in 1.3 seconds (a.k.a. light seconds).
  • What about Interplanetary Travel (i.e. travel between the planets of the Solar System)?  At the SPEED OF LIGHT, you would arrive at Mars in around 4 minutes (a.k.a. light minutes).  Once you pass Mars, be careful!  Roughly 45 million to 231 million miles from Mars, there are a congregation of asteroids between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter called: The Asteroid Belt.  You should get there within 4 to 21 minutes after passing Mars.  Wouldn't want anything to happen to your spaceship.  At the SPEED OF LIGHT, you would arrive at Pluto in a little over 5 hours (a.k.a. light hours).  At this point, we are nearing the Kuiper Belt, the Scattered Disc, and Oort cloud, and the end of our Solar System.  The Solar System is: the collection of planets and their moons in orbit around the Sun, together with smaller bodies in the form of asteroids, meteoroids, and comets.  So, it basically consists of the Sun together with all the planets and other bodies that revolve around it.  Our Solar System is located within one of the outer spiral "arms" of the Milky Way (i.e. The OrionCygnus Arm or Local Spur).  At the SPEED OF LIGHT, you would leave the Kuiper Belt and off toward the Oort Cloud in around 2 1/2 weeks (i.e. light weeks) (give or take).  At the SPEED OF LIGHT, you would reach the edge of the Oort Cloud and, thus, the end of our Solar System in roughly 9 1/2 months (a.k.a light months) (give or take).  When we leave the Solar System, we find our star and its planets are just one small part of the Milky Way galaxy. The Milky Way is a huge city of stars. All the stars in the night sky, including our Sun, are just some of the residents of this galaxy, along with millions of other stars too faint to be seen.
  • What about Interstellar Travel (i.e. manned or unmanned travel between stars)?  At the SPEED OF LIGHT, you would arrive at the nearest star (Alpha Centauri, a triple-star system visible from the southern hemisphere) in about 4.3 years (a.k.a. light years).
  • What about Intragalactic Travel (i.e. travel within a single galaxy)?  At the SPEED OF LIGHT, you could travel across our Milky Way Galaxy in 100,000 years.
  • Beyond our own galaxy lies a vast expanse of galaxies.  A galaxy is: a huge group of stars, dust, gas, and other celestial bodies bound together by gravitational forces.  We are part of a "Local Group" of galaxies.  A Local Group is: the cluster of galaxies to which we belong.  It is a group of about 30 galaxies that is about 5 million light years across.  The Local Group we belong to is the Milky Way (of course), Andromeda M31, Triangulum, Fornax, the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, M32, M33, M101, and 9 dwarf spheroidal galaxies.  The deeper we see into space, the more galaxies we discover. 
  • What about Intergalactic Travel (i.e. travel from one galaxy to another)?  At the SPEED OF LIGHT, you'd be able to travel to the closest Galaxy to us, The Andromeda M31 Galaxy, in 2.5 million years (2 million 500 thousand years).  Intergalatic Travel poses all the difficulties of Interstellar Travel multiplied a million fold.  As go further out into space, we would see what is called a "cluster of galaxies."  A Galaxy Cluster is: a system of galaxies that contains up to thousands of galaxies bound together by gravitational forces.  These huge systems of galaxies are filled with enormous clouds of extremely hot gas (as high as a hundred million degrees) held together by gravitational forces.  The largest galaxies in a cluster are pulled to the center of the cluster and large clusters capture nearby galaxies with their enormous gravitational forces, continuing to grow over time.  As you group these Galaxy Clusters, you form what is called: a Galaxy Cloud.  A Galaxy Cloud is: a group of galaxy clusters and a substructure of a supercluster.  We are part of the Local Supercuster.  You put all these Galaxy Clouds together and they form what is called: "Superclusters."  Superclusters are: a group of Galaxy Clusters, and Galaxy Clouds, typically consisting of 3 to 10 clusters spanning as many as 2 hundred million light years.  They are the largest structures in the Universe.  We are part of what is called: the Virgo Supercluster, thought to contain over 47,000 galaxies.  Astronomers believe that there are some 10 million Superclusters in the observable Universe.  These Superclusters form large structures of galaxies called: "filaments," "supercluster complexes," "walls," or "sheets" that may span between several hundred million light years to 10 billion light years, covering more than 5% of the observable Universe.

Now, the big one!  The entire Universe!  How long would it take us to go from one end of the Universe to the other when traveling at the SPEED OF LIGHT?  Well, latest studies indicate that the Universe is about 13.7 billion years old (give or take).  However, there's an issue here...  The "visible universe" has a radius of 46 billion light years.  And, on average, the "other end" of the Universe has been receding 4 light years further away every year.  So, if we were to calculate how long it would take to traverse the current diameter of the "visible Universe," (which is 92 billion light years) at the SPEED OF LIGHT, this works out to be about 45.7 billion years experienced in a spaceship!  That's roughly 14 gigaparsecs (14,000,001,814.82 parsecs).  And that's just the "visible Universe" alone!  There are still other parts of the Universe that we can't even see, let alone observe!  For all WE know, there may be additional "Universes" adjacent to our own!  WOW!  So, if you were immortal (and none of us are), you'd be hearing the question: "Are we there yet?" quite often!

So, as you see, everything in the Universe seems to be part of something bigger.  All of us occupy an abode we call a Residence (i.e. an apartment or a house).  Those residences are situated on a land we call an Address (e.g. a road, a lane, a boulevard, a drive, an avenue, or a street).  Most of these addresses are located in vicinities called: Neighborhoods.  These neighborhoods are a part of a city, town, or megalopolis.  All of these places are part of a Sate.  Each state is a part of an organized political territory under one government known as a nation or country.  Not counting Taiwan and Kosovo, there are 195 countries in the world (i.e. 193 U.N. Members and 2 Observer States).  All of these countries (and the seven seas that surround them), from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, are all part of the planet called Earth.  Our Earth is part of the Solar System.  The Solar System is part of the Milky Way Galaxy.  Our Milky Way is part a Galaxy Cluster.  Our Galaxy Cluster is part of a Local Group of clusters.  All Local Groups are part of the Galaxy Cloud.  Each Galaxy Cloud is part of a Supercluster.  The largest structures in the Universe are the Superclusters, measuring hundreds of millions of light years across and containing millions of galaxies.

This, of course, would probably raise the next question, which is: "If everything in the Universe seems to be part of something bigger, then is there anything BIGGER than our Universe?"  Well, that's hard to say.  There are theories out there, but no one really knows for sure yet. Some say that there is NOTHING bigger than our Universe, because nothing can exist in a complete empty vacuum (such as outer space).  Zero-point energy fills the empty vacuum and nothing exist outside energy.  As we have just discussed, something must exist in something else. What does the Universe exist in?  It exist within itself, nothing exist outside of it.  However, some speculative theories have proposed that this Universe is but one of a set of disconnected Universes, collectively denoted as the "Omniverse."  This theory is not a new as it sounds.  Bishop Étienne Tempier of Paris (a.k.a. Stephanus of Orleans) ruled in 1277 that God could create as many Universes as he saw fit.  The Omniverse term is used to refer to the total collective existence of universes.  This not be confused with the "Multiverse," which is a hypothetical set of infinite or finite possible Universes (including the historical universe we consistently experience) that together comprise everything that exists and can exist.  In these contexts, they are also called: "parallel universes," "alternative universes," "quantum universes," "interpenetrating dimensions," "parallel dimensions", "parallel worlds," "alternative realities," "alternative timelines," and "dimensional planes."  The Omniverse, however, is composed of countless independent, and defined Universes which exist in their own isolated state, operating under their own Spatial-Temporal Laws and Nature, each having its own distinct context of space and time, as well as other fundamental forces.  God Himself is an inhabitant of the Omniverse.  While the Omniverse itself cannot be defined as having a "shape" or "form," it does have a center, which is the extra-dimensional construct known as: the Nexus of Creation.  When God fashioned that Creation and then detonated it with the Power Divine, it sent forth a massive shock wave which would form the energy matrix of the Omniversal Chain, which embodies all of known existence on its level of reality, and it seeded the Void with elements of primal matter, which then began the slow evolutionary process leading to all existence and, ultimately, life itself.  2 Peter 1:3 say that:  "His divine power has given us everything we need for life and godliness through our knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness."

You know, when I was a college student, one of my favorite pastimes was stargazing.  I was fascinated by the stars of the night sky for two reasons. First, just like the humans, animals, and plants of the Earth, they are some of God's greatest masterpieces.  And second, I knew that looking at the stars and of the constellations, I was not only seeing how small we really are by the Universe's standards, but I was looking into the past with each speck of light that I would behold.  Even seeing the rays of the Sun is looking into a recent past.  It takes the light emitted from the Sun 8.3 minutes (i.e. light minutes) to reach the Earth.  So, the next time you spend some time you're outside in the sunlight, you will know that those ultraviolet lights that are beaming on your skin were emitted from the Sun 8 minutes and 18 seconds before it even got to you.  But the stars?  They are a totally different matter.  They represent a past that is far more distant.  Look at our nearest star (Alpha Centauri). The light of that particular star takes about 4.3 years (4 years, 3 months, 2 weeks, 4 days, 15 hours, 1 minute, and 44.4576 seconds) to reach the Earth.  And that's our NEAREST star.  Other stars take millions, even billions of years to reach the Earth.  And why?  Because those stars are millions and billions of light years away from us.  Like a ship in the empty ocean, astronomers on Earth can turn their telescopes to peer 13.7 billion light years in every direction, which puts Earth inside of an observable sphere with a radius of 13.7 billion light years.  The word: "observable" is key.  The sphere limits what scientists can see but not what is there.  Just because we cannot see land does not mean we are in the center of the ocean, right?  Well, it's the same with our Universe.  Just because we cannot see the edge of the Universe does not mean we lie in the center of the Universe.

Now, there are many theories as to what would happen if we were to go past the SPEED OF LIGHT (i.e. break the "Light Barrier").  Some say that since time seems to slow down as you approach the SPEED OF LIGHT, it is hypothesized that "time" itself will stop.  Why?  Because to your perception, time outside your spaceship goes on at the rate of infinity.  Yes, infinity!  So what happens when you break the SPEED OF LIGHT?  You would perceive time outside the spaceship at going "more than" infinity.  Obviously, it's impossible for us to comprehend time progressing at "more than" infinity.  This may be part of the reason scientist plan to call the velocity that would be the hypothetical Faster-than-Speed-of-Light "Warp Drive."  A spacecraft equipped with a Warp Drive may travel at apparent speeds by many orders of magnitude, while circumventing the relativistic problem of time dilation.  In other words, "time" itself would become distorted or "warped."  The answer could lie in higher dimensions, or it could simply be that you would be around after the Universe itself ended.  Unfortunately, it's just as impossible to add anything to infinity as it is to divide by zero, so we may never know what would happen in theory.  There is one thing to keep in mind about THIS theory.  Although this is conjectural, calculating Warp Speed (a.k.a. the Warp Factor) equals the cubic root of the ship's achieved speed ratio V/C (i.e. Cubic Root of Velocity divided by the Speed of Light).  Traveling at Warp Speed is not the same as traveling at Mach Speed.  Remember how I told you that Mach 1 is the SPEED OF SOUND, Mach 2 was twice the SPEED OF SOUND, Mach 3 was three times the SPEED OF SOUND, and so on and so forth?  Well, when you travel at Warp Speed, something begins to happen.  When the speed of a car, bus, or train accelerates, they go up additively.  When a plane goes faster than the SPEED OF SOUND, it goes up multiplicatively.  Once we hit THE SPEED OF LIGHT (i.e. Warp Speed) or faster, it goes up exponentially.  So, for example, Warp 1 would equal the SPEED OF LIGHT.  However, Warp 2 would be 8 times the SPEED OF LIGHT.  Why?  Because 2^3 (i.e. 2 cubed or 3 to the third power) is equal to 8.  Warp 3 would be 27 times the SPEED OF LIGHT.  Why?  Because 3^3 (i.e. 3 cubed or 3 to the third power) is equal to 27.  So, what would Warp 14 be?  It would be 2,744 times the SPEED OF LIGHT.  A theoretical solution for faster-than-light travel which models the Warp Drive concept is called the "Alcubierre Drive."  Such calculations involve Negative Mass, which has never been supported by any evidence.  And why are the calculations different at Warp Speed than at Mach Speed?  Because it is postulated that the SPEED OF LIGHT is not a constant.  The SPEED OF LIGHT is a dimensional quantity and it cannot be measured.  So, there is no limit on the value of a proper velocity (a.k.a. a celerity) as a proper speed does not represent a speed measured in a single inertial frame.  Other theoretical physicists say that you would become what is known as: a Tachyon.  That is, you would live as a hypothetical substance whose velocity always exceeds the Speed of Light.  The word comes from the Greek: ταχύς or "tachýs," meaning "swift, quick, fast, rapid", and was coined in 1967 by Gerald Feinberg.  So, just as an ordinary particle (such as bradyons) can exist only at speeds less than the speed of light,, so a tachyon could exist only at speeds above the speed of light.  Therefore, just as bradyons are forbidden to break the Light Barrier, so too are tachyons forbidden from slowing down to below the Speed of Light, because infinite energy is required to reach the barrier from either above or below.  Other scientist believe that a Photonic Boom (or Photonic Flash) would occur.  As we've discovered, Sonic Booms arise when the speed of the generator of sound (a plane) exceeds the SPEED OF SOUND in the medium.  The wave fronts of the light add constructively (just as the wave fronts of sound add in a Sonic Boom) to produce a light flash (a Photonic Boom or Photonic Flash) called: "Cerenkov Radiation"  The characteristic blue glow of an underwater nuclear reactor is due to Cerenkov Radiation, for example.  But like Chuck Yeager breaking the Sound Barrier, until we become capable of moving at the SPEED OF LIGHT, any occurrence we say that would happen as a result, at this point, is purely speculation.

As I have mentioned, the SPEED OF LIGHT is the fastest speed we know of in Physics.  However, if you were to ask the question: "Is there anything that can outdo the SPEED OF LIGHT?", technically, the answer would be: "yes."  Why?  Because there is something in our Universe that can overcome the SPEED OF LIGHT.  But it wouldn't be by velocity or electromagnetism but another of our fundamental forces in Quantum Mechanics Gravitation.  And the massive objects I'm speaking of are: Black Holes.  Black Holes are: regions of space-time from which gravity is so strong that it prevents anything (including LIGHT) from escaping it.  So, if you were in a spaceship and a Black Hole was about to force you into it, your escape velocity would have to exceed the SPEED OF LIGHT.  But it is unknown as to what extent it has to exceed it.  It could be Warp 1.5.  It could be Warp 15.  Nobody knows the escape velocity, nor do we know what happens once an object enters a Black Hole.  Theories range FROM being torn apart by the growing tidal forces in a process sometimes referred to as "spaghettification" and crushed to infinite density TO exiting the Black Hole to another spacetime (i.e. as a 'gateway' or 'wormhole') and traveling to another Universe.  Nobody really knows for sure.  All we DO know is that anything that enters a Black Hole disappears from the Universe forever.  There is general consensus that supermassive Black Holes exist in the centers of most galaxies (e.g. our Milky Way galaxy).  Once a Black Hole has formed, it can continue to grow by absorbing additional matter.  Any Black Hole will continually absorb gas and interstellar dust from its direct surroundings and omnipresent cosmic background radiation.  This is the primary process through which supermassive Black Holes seem to have grown.  Did you know that the biggest Black Hole known in the Universe (located in the NGC 1277  galaxy, 10% the size of the Milky Way, situated around 220 million light years from Earth, and in the constellation Perseus) weighs 17 billion times more than our Sun?  It's also 11 times bigger than the diameter of Neptune's orbit around the Sun.  Think about it.  It takes light 17 minutes to travel the diameter of Earth's orbit around the Sun.  However, it takes light 4 days to travel the diameter of this supermassive Black Hole.  It takes light almost 339 times longer to travel the diameter of this supermassive Black Hole than it would to travel the diameter of our own Sun.  That's 3 thousanths of a percent (i.e. 0.003%) to travel the diameter of Earth compared to the diameter of this supermassive Black Hole.  To put it another way,  Black Holes at the center of a typical galaxy only take up around 0.1% of the total galactic mass.  However, the newly-discovered Black Hole takes up 14% of the NC 1277 galaxy.  By comparison, the Black Hole at the heart of the Milky Way is around four million Solar Masses.  Think about in comparison to our Sun.  Our Sun's diameter is about 864,938 miles.  So, you could line up 109 Earths across the face of our Sun.  Then, we have its circumference.  Our Sun's circumference is about 2,713,406 miles around.  The entire mass of our Sun is approximately 333,420 times of Earth and the volume of our Sun could hold more than one million Earths.  Our Sun weighs 2,192,607,428,559,700,100,774,887,424 (2 octillion, 192 septillion, 607 sextillion, 428 quintillion, 559 quadrillion, 700 trillion, 100 billion, 774 million, 887 thousand, 424) tons.  This supermassive Black Hole weighs 17 billion times more than that.  That would equal out to be an estimated 37.274326 undecillion (37 undecillion, 274 decillion, 326 nonillion) tons.  WOW!  Put simply, it's off the scale (to say the least).  Hard to imagine, isn't it?  The question is: why are we not able find out certain things about the Universe (e.g. what's beyond a Black Hole)?  Well, even scientist have come up with what is known as: The Principle of Cosmic Censorship.  What is that?  Well, the Principle of Cosmic Censorship basically postulates that: singularities in space and time are always surrounded by event horizons that prevent them from being observed and from influencing the outside world.  In other words, something or "someone" (whether a 'force' or 'supernatural Being') does not want you to know certain things about the Universe and, thus, will not allow intelligent creatures of any planet (e.g. human beings) to discover those cosmic truths.  Could God Himself be behind that Cosmic Censorship?  Could it be that there are mysteries about our Universe that God does not want man to know, no matter how hard we try?  Isaiah 55:8-9 does say: "'For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,' declares the Lord.  'As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts."  Hey, when dealing with God or quanta, anything's possible.

So, what does any of this have to do with understanding God?  Well, when we determine the distances to the stars within our galaxy or even further to the 500 billion other galaxies in the Universe, we are talking about distances that are very, very hard to visualize and comprehend.  Even trying to picture the distance to the closest star to us (Alpha Centuari), which is 4.3 light years distance from us, it's hard to visualize when you think that 4.3 light years is almost 26 trillion miles away from us and we kind of go: "Huh?  What?"  Saying 26 trillion miles is not something that is easily visualized.  And if we can’t visualize 26 trillion miles, how can we possibly visualize a galaxy that is 13.7 billion light years away?  How can anyone understand these distances when you remember that one light year equals a distance of almost 6 trillion miles and you want to understand what 13.7 billion individual light years distance is?  If you’d like to figure out the mileage, that would be 13.7 billion multiplied by 6 trillion.  That would equal out to be 82.2 sextillion (82 sextillion, 200 quintillion) miles!  If we can take the product of that and multiply it by the mileage that we would calculate in the "unobservable" part of our Universe, we would probably end up with a number called a "Googol" (a 1 followed by a 100 zeros, or 10^100).  So, for all WE know, if we were to multiply mileage of the entire Omniverse (assuming that other independent Universes exist), we may end up with a product in the hundreds of "Ducentillions" (a number with 603 zeros after it, 1,000 centillions, or 1 million to the 100.5 power) miles or even a "Googolplex" (a 1 followed by a googol of zeros, 10 billion to the 100th power, or 10^10^100) miles.  Again, WOW!  That's really hard to imagine!  All we can ever accept or understand of a number this large is that it’s a number with a lot of zeroes.  So, as you see, if we have difficult wrapping our minds around the enormity of our cosmos, how are we to fully comprehend the concept of God?  How are we able to mentally grasp the notion of an Invisible, Inaudible, Intangible, Incorporeal, Immutableomnificentomniscient, Omnipotent, Omnipresent, Omnibenevolent, Transcendent, Divine, Supernatural Being who possess Veracity and Aseity?  I've been studying the Holy Bible since I was 10 years of age, not to mention various Science books for most of my adult life, and I don't even come close to understanding it.  It is quite difficult to define "infinity" with our finite minds.  Our Solar System is enormous for us (the inhabitants of the planet Earth), but extremely minuscule as a part of the whole Universe.  Looking at it astronomically, our entire Solar System is akin to a "single atom" hidden in the peripheral side of Mount Everest; our Earth is an electron and we are riding on this electron with the "Sun" as the nucleus.  Our Milky Way galaxy is but one of millions of molecules.  These groups of atoms bonded together will attach themselves to other units of chemical compounds creating cellular-like structures known as Galaxy Clusters.  These "cells" of Galaxy Clusters attach to one another to form the "mulitcelluar organisms" known as Superclusters.  The 10 million Superclusters in the observable Universe which form large structures of galaxies called: "filaments," "supercluster complexes," "walls," or "sheets" that span 10 billion light years are like the six Kingdoms of the taxonomic rank.  Not only the Universe itself but other possible Universes (i.e. the Omniverse) can represent the three Domains of Life within the biological classification.  As you see, in Biology, each rank subsumes under it a number of less general categories.  The rank of Kingdom are divided into smaller groups called Phyla, which divides into a Class, which divides into an Order, which divides into a Family, which divides into a Genus, which divides into a Species.  The specification of the Genus to which the Species belongs is basic.  Similarly, the Omniverse divides into Universes, which divides into Superclusters, which divides into Galaxy Clusters, which divides into Galaxies, which divide into Solar Systems, and so on and so forth.  This "small single atom" of a Solar System and its sole sentient planetary inhabitants ("we"), at one time, centuries ago, had the audacity to claim "ourselves" at the center of the Universe.  Within these infinite tininess and immensity, we are insignificant small players within a humongous jigsaw puzzle.  The Encyclopedia Britannica defines infinity as: the abstract  concept describing something limitless or endless in space, extent, or size that is impossible to measure or calculate.  The English word "infinity" derives from the Latin word: "infinitas," meaning "being without finish," which can be translated as "unboundedness," itself calqued from the Greek word: "apeiros," meaning "endless."  When taken a trip through the Universe, it is still difficult to grasp the concept of infinity, let alone God.  Think of our "Imaginations" as a room (such as in a house).  Some people have bigger rooms (or imaginations) than others, right?  But even in those rooms, we are confined to a place that has three measurable dimensions (height, length, and width).  Because of this, our imaginations with our finite minds can only take us so far.  The walls in our "rooms" keep us from going further out.  As I guided you through a journey of the Universe; hearing all those calculations; comparing all those measurements of speed, distance, and time, how far were you able to stretch you imagination?  Most likely further than you thought, right?  That's only a fraction of what you would experience if you looked at our Universe (or even the Omniverse) through God's eyes.  Through God's eyes, our planet Earth, let alone our Solar System, is but an infinitesimally small blip in the cosmic superhighway we call: "our Universe."

My friends, I, like many, have my curiosities about what is beyond what we see and know.  But I also have my curiosities as whether we SHOULD know certain about our Universe.  In comparison to Biology, look at the deepest inner workings of the brain.  We may never find all of those things out.  The brain is the control center for the entire body.  It controls absolutely everything, from the physical to the mental activity.  It controls life itself (biologically).  Perhaps we human beings were never meant to completely know and understand what controls life.  Perhaps it's the same with Astronomy.  Perhaps we human beings were never meant to completely know and understand EVERYTHING about our Universe (e.g. what's within a Black Hole), let alone life's meaning and purpose.  In addition to the scientific Principle of Cosmic Censorship, we have the Holy Bible.  We are told by the Prophet Isaiah in Isaiah 64:4 that: "Since ancient times no one has heard, no ear has perceived, no eye has seen any God besides you, who acts on behalf of those who wait for him."  The Apostle Paul reiterates this in 1 Corinthians 2:9 when he said: "However, as it is written: 'What no eye has seen, what no ear has heard, and what no human mind has conceived'— the things God has prepared for those who love him"  These words have been applied to the state of glory in a future world, but they certainly belong to the present state.  No one can imagine the beauty and love in Heaven.  It is far more than we can even conceive.  Whether it be through a telescope or the Holy Spirit, we are given little GLIMPSES of the perceptual experiences of the pleasures of such sublimity and grandeur which inspires great admiration and awe of Heaven, bu the Apostle Paul was stating the impossibility of people understanding God's wisdom through their own mental abilities.  Compared to anything any person could ever come up with, the wisdom from God and description of the Universe is something ineffable.  In the Realm of the Living, perhaps it should remain an enigma.